Thursday, March 29, 2007
Seedfolks
I definitely had some favorite stories, like the old man in a wheelchair with his caregiver who was just so excited to have dirt on his fingers. And the man who planted Lateesha's tomatoes, waiting for the smallest acknowledgment from a window. And, of course, the young girl who started it all. Driven by a need for acceptance or recognition from her dead father, Kim started a good deed that bloomed into a community. I was also taken with Sam, the man who tries to patch up the world, one person at a time. I was surprised to learn that the word "paradise" comes from a Persian word meaning "walled park". How incredibly appropriate! In his wisdom, Sam realizes that the garden is turning into a miniature Cleveland: fences and barbed wire dividing cultures and people. This is an insightful look at human nature itself. Given a wide space, people carve out places for themselves, creating boundaries and territories. It's just what we do. (We also have a habit of staring out windows at our neighbors. In this story, Anna first suspects Kim of hiding drugs in the space behind the refrigerator until she finds the truth. In my neighborhood, I have a love/hate relationship with neighbors who stare out their windows all day. The speed limit here is 15 mph. Enough said.)
Paul Fleischman's writing is very thoughtful. It is obvious that he took time writing and editing, considering the thoughts and feelings of each character. I was sad that each character was only focused on for one chapter, but then I got really excited if a familiar person showed up in someone else's story. I found myself noting several passages to keep in my notebook. Here are some of them:
"Over the narrow, bumpy path we went, his nose and eyes working. Some remembered scent was pulling him. He was a salmon traveling upstream through his past." p 47
"Gardening boring? Never! It had suspense, tragedy, startling developments - a soap opera growing out of the ground." p 49
"Here you have a million crabs living in a million crevices." p 58
"You can't see Canada across Lake Erie, but you know it's there. It's the same with spring." p 68
Monday, March 26, 2007
Milkweed
I have a really hard time reading about the Holocaust. I usually cry a lot, affected by everything I read. With this one, I at least knew Misha wouldn't die...surely Jerry Spinelli wouldn't do that to his readers! What I did really find inspiring, though, was the way Spinelli continued the story even after the Holocaust was over. There were many quirky characters and plot turns to keep the story moving, but when it was all said and done, it was all about Misha. Because the focus wasn't necessarily the war, the story kept going as Misha lived his life into adulthood. For most of his life, he was really lonely, and never shared the story of Janina (his best friend and sister) with anyone, keeping Janina all to himself. I've been considering that maybe he kept Janina to himself because he felt guilty that he couldn't save her or her family, like he was supposed to. My heart breaks for him when he stands on a street corner ranting about the horrors of the war, tearing up copies of Hansel and Gretel whenever he finds them, eventually marrying and then losing his wife. Though the end is a whirlwind of his life and the majority of the story is during the war, it is necessary because the war had such an impact on his life. Many of the details of his life ended when Janina was taken.
This is a great book for historical fiction. In the interview with Jerry Spinelli at the back of this edition, he notes that he researched for months before he began writing. I'd be interested to know where he got the idea to name the novel Milkweed and integrate it in the story. I imagine he wrote about milkweed (dandelions) first, and named the novel last, as the milkweed symbolized hope in the ghetto.
Monday, March 19, 2007
Sidewalk Circus
I’m not a huge fan of the circus, but I believe its appeal is in death-defying feats or silly actions that draw a response from the audience, specifically kids. For a living, these performers do extraordinary things that cannot be found anywhere else! In this book, Fleischman and Hawkes have created an extraordinary world out of the ordinary. I am curious about how Fleischman and Hawkes worked together. The book is “presented by Paul Fleischman”, but there really isn’t any text. Does that just mean it was his idea and he needed an illustrator?
Al Capone Does My Shirts
One of the most interesting parts of the book, though, was the explanation at the end. Gennifer Choldenko did a wonderful job of incorporating so many small facts in her fictionalized story that the Author’s Note was really a ‘behind the scenes’ look at
The main character, Moose Flanagan, is tall for his age (10) and has a sister, Natalie. Though Natalie is 15, her mother tells everyone that she is 10, year after year. Natalie actually has severe autism, but this was in a time before autism was officially named. In her note, Choldenko mentions that the character of Natalie “is not meant to symbolize or represent autism in any way”, though she also describes some characteristics of autism and how they fit into Natalie’s character. She was actually modeled after Choldenko’s sister, who had autism.
Over the summer I saw a 5th grader reading this book, and though he couldn’t really talk about it much, he really seemed to enjoy it. There are many kid-characters that young readers can identify with. Though it’s a story about the kids on the island of Alcatraz, the heart of the story centers on Moose’s family, particularly their relationship with Natalie and the challenges they have as a family trying to get help for her while being supportive of each other. At many points in the story, Moose resents Natalie and being responsible for her, but of his entire family, his relationship with Natalie might just be the strongest. Moose’s love for his sister gives him determination and a strong will that leads him to ask for help in unlikely places. I would recommend this book to anyone, specifically for readers of historical fiction.
The Van Gogh Cafe
One thing I’ve noticed about Cynthia Rylant is that she really sets the stage for her stories. She uses ellipses to lead the reader into the next part of the story. Possible hooks include “This is their story…” or “What he found was a story worth telling…”. In the Van Gogh Café, Rylant ends many chapters with an ellipsis, helping the reader predict what will happen next. I also loved the language in this book, especially on page 5: “
A short read, I enjoyed finding all the wondrous things that happened at this café just off I-70. I have actually been on I-70 – where was this café when I was stuck in
Nothing But the Truth
The book is written as a documentary novel, meaning it is only dialogue. There are no descriptive paragraphs, only conversations between characters in the story. Philip’s diary entries are the only sections not written like this, but they are needed to give a clear idea of his 14-year-old thoughts. I enjoyed having only dialogue, which illustrates how important speech can be throughout a story. It did not matter what any of the characters looked like or thought to themselves; all that mattered was what they said and did.
Ironic that the title of the story is Nothing But The Truth, but the only person who actually knows the truth is the reader. I kept hoping it would be resolved in the end, but the characters just went about their lives, glad the conflict has resided from headline news. I’m wondering what the author’s thoughts on this conflict really are – did Avi have an experience like this? If not, what was his inspiration? What is he really trying to say? I wish there had been an Author’s Note at the end explaining the origin of this story.
The Great Gilly Hopkins
I was surprised at the end! Not to be a spoiler, but I wanted Gilly to end up with Trotter and William Ernest instead of her grandmother. It wasn’t exactly a “happily-ever-after” kind of story – it was more “life is tough, let’s deal with it”, as I would expect from Katherine Paterson. Though Bridge to Terabithia was not a happily ever after story either, the character of Gilly is so different from either Jess or Leslie. Gilly is so much angrier and actually reminds me of Janice Avery, the bully from Bridge. It’s like her perception of the world is purposely warped; she is convinced her teacher hates her as a way to validate her own distaste.
There was really no mention of setting for this book other than one reference to the Metropolitan area of
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
The Giver
I can't imagine a world without music or color. I'm vaguely reminded of Pleasantville and black and white tvs, but even then there was music. It's hard to imagine that in a future world people would willingly relinquish their individuality and human rights for Sameness, a less complicated and more structured life. True, there's no hunger, and true, everyone has a job and a family unit, but this utopia is only perfect on the surface. Jonas and the Giver are the only ones who understand true feelings - everyone else plays along, though there is no depth to their emotions. The community is not even allowed to play with language. Precision is valued above anything else - sarcasm would have no place (and they'd kick me out for sure). Strange, though, that precision is so honored, yet their term for flat-out euthanasia is just 'release'.
Here is a community that believes it can learn from the past, but that not everyone should experience those memories. I can't imagine bearing the memories of the world alone, the strength needed to face other members of the community and know their past even while they do not. In this perfect world, there is much deception, and yet those who deceive others truly believe it is for the good of the community. I've read this book a few times now, and always get chills when I remember that Rosemary was The Giver's daughter. How difficult it would be to place all the joy and then pain of the world on the shoulders of someone so young. On the other hand, wouldn't it be so helpful, especially for teachers, if we could transmit necessary background knowledge to kids? Wow, we could even regulate the background experiences to be all the same...differentiation wouldn't even be an issue. If that worked, we'd have a better grasp on the nature vs. nurture argument.
I've noticed a trend in futuristic science fiction novels that the government regulates the number of children in a family, usually to two (one boy and one girl is usually desired). This was the case in Ender's Game, a book I read recently, and also a newer book called Among the Hidden by Margaret Peterson Haddix and Cliff Nielsen. I guess population control is really on people's minds. In The Giver, there was little honor in being a birthmother. Another thing I thought was really interesting was the stressed need for interdependence. Though not expressed in love or good works toward others beyond volunteer hours, young children were required to wear jackets that buttoned up the back.
Though this is a short book and a quick read, there is much character development. Jonas is a sensitive and often articulate young boy who soon becomes much different than his robot-like parents and community neighbors. The Giver is, of course, very grandfather-ish and I imagine him to be like my own grandfather. In her writing, Lowry helps the reader identify with Jonas and The Giver quickly and emotionally in their struggle to face the outside world with their knowledge. This is the kind of book that requires some thought afterwards. I came back to the book and read the possible discussion questions at the end, but soon realized that I didn't want to think about Jonas and Gabriel possibly slipping into a cold-induced coma, remembering the joyful memory of family and love and holidays. I'd rather believe he had really found it, that it existed Elsewhere and would take him inside readily. Life is often ambiguous as it is...I need that happy ending.
Saturday, March 3, 2007
The Flying Dragon Room
Patrick and his family are repainting their house with the help of Mrs. Jenkins, who presents Patrick with her special tools and tells him to see what he can make. With these tools, Patrick creates a whole new world, each "room" named something new for his family to marvel at and enjoy. For example, there is a Subterranean room with creatures and plants that live in caves underground (though there is also a stone waterfountain), a Bubble room in which baby Sarah is carried off on top of a bubble, a Food room, a Jumping Room where everyone can defy gravity with twists and turns, a Snake Slide (which had no sides - too scary!), an adventure on the high seas, and an up-close-and-personal encounter with dinosaurs. True, these are exciting places, but where's the Flying Dragon Room? At the end, we find that Mrs. Jenkins created the Flying Dragon Room with her special tools and invites Patrick's whole family to come, but we don't get to see it! The book is titled The Flying Dragon Room, but we only get a taste of it at the end!
This story seemed very reminiscent of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. It may have been a little more exciting if Willy Wonka showed up in the pictures...at least Gene Wilder or Johnny Depp. Thinking of how to use this book, it could be used for some interesting writing extensions. Students could write about the special rooms they would create for themselves, or maybe even write about the flying dragon room! It would be interesting to let them illustrate their own rooms. If anyone ever sees a good picture of the flying dragon room, let me know.
Baloney (Henry P.)
Miss Maggie
The old woman, Miss Maggie, lives in a log house all alone. Her closest neighbor is Nat, whose grandmother sends him to Miss Maggie's house with buttermilk or beans. Nat's fear of Miss Maggie and the black snake that he believes lives with her keeps him from entering her house even when he's invited...until one day when he has to. On a winter day, Nat notices there is no smoke coming from her chimney. It is too cold to be without a fire, so Nat goes to investigate. He finds Miss Maggie sitting on her floor, holding a piece of cloth. In that cloth is a starling named Henry. Nat takes both of them to his grandad. In the end, we never find out if the starling lives, but I can assume it did not. From that moment on, Nat and Miss Maggie become special friends and when spring comes, Nat brings Miss Maggie a new pet, a black garden snake he has named Henry. Nat's good-naturedness and strength of heart helped him overcome his fear of the old woman. Sometimes it's the tough situations in which people just act instead of think that change the course of events.
The illustrations (done by Thomas DiGrazia) are what slowed me down the second time around. There is a sadness in them that captures the story. I was wondering why the illustrator chose to use only black and white. The only color is a faint green and blue on the front cover. But then I thought that this story is almost dream-like, a little blurred around the edges, "a story worth telling" as Rylant says on the first page. The first time I read this picture book, I wasn't crazy about it. But now that I've had to take the time to sit down and write my thoughts, I've found that I like it a little more. Aging is a difficult subject, but I think Rylant handled it tactfully and with grace.
p.s. - I was quickly searching for a picture of this book, and though I could not find one, I came across a site that was selling this book for over $50! I have a renewed appreciation for libraries that temporarily provide books for free.
The Midwife's Apprentice
A Pocketful of Goobers
Pencil shading is used for the illustrations, though the front cover looks to be done with watercolor. Whenever I see pictures made with pencil shading, I'm gripped with this illusion that I, too, can draw if I only have a pencil. Alas, it never works out that way. This biography was also great for vocabulary, especially for an agricultural unit. There were many words I wrote down, but then many I also chose not to, such as goober. I grew up loving that word because that's how my dad refers to peanuts, but I just decided to write down the words I didn't know. Some of the ones I did keep were: pellagra (p 28), sorghum (p 35), and chemurgy (p 57). Overall, I felt like I had really learned something in my 40 minutes with this book. I enjoyed the section in the back titled "More about GWC" that offered more information that did not fit well into the flow of the story. I walked away with some interesting connections and a sense of gratitude for the accomplishments of those who came before me.